Like the Seduction of Religion: Confessions of a Would-Be Anarchist
...’ Now Senator Olympia Snowe is reiterating the position that 13% of income is an acceptable maximum out-of-pocket cost for health premiums. That is financially devastating for families at 400% - 700% of the Federal Poverty Level (and many at higher levels). Since the President has ceded extraordinary power to her, this is likely to become law if she so chooses. It's a windfall to the insurers and a body blow to working Americans.” (From the Huffington Post)
Facebook and Twitter create apathy, not action. They are just additional tools of civilization’s ruling elite, to keep us under the thumb of their political hegemony. We remain enslaved to these distractions, which keep us from taking responsibility for our lives – going where we need to go and doing what we need to do. It is like an elixir, a drug, used by the ruling hegemony to keep us enslaved to them and their 'system' forever!






kultur, I know and for the most part accept your critique but I wish you could define "system" a little more clearly and identify points of attack. It is hard to create a strategy to fight a hegemon if we don't know it's objective method of reproducing itself. Just changing government officials doesnt do it, more alternative media doesnt do it,becoming involved in capitalist politics doesnt do it.....?
Reply to this
troutsky - that is my central problem. I am not certain there is an objective method by means of which to alter the landscape postively, politically or otherwise. I think civilization, and its political 'systems' are the symptom of the problem... so another 'system' cannot fix things. The root cause of course is the change in human social groupings that brought about hierarchy. That I do not know how to undo.
Reply to this
Sandy,
Couldn't help but notice throughout this piece you are plenty inclusive with your pronoun "we" while naming the lulled prey of your ingenious plot until at the end where you wish everyone would enjoy "THEIR freedom as if you were no longer among them. Could you explain how you do that, or even how your generalization seems to include victims and the system, denying any alternative to your duality, or individual, tribal syntheses of both. These are those "interesting times", and doomsdayers seem like little more than hysterical cheerleaders for inevitability.
Reply to this
Yodood - Not sure I can explain anything. After all explanation is a tool of scientific and historical consciousness; I endorse neither of those!
Reply to this
Not sure what you think you are using language for, but you certainly lost my interest with that reply.
Reply to this
Not sure what you believe your use of language serves, but with that reply, it is no longer my interest.
if this shows up twice, blame your blog mechanism. It wiped out the first time.
Reply to this
As you both know I have been exploring both some of these language questions and these pragmatist questions of who can say who recognizes their own self-interest? It is hard , under capitalist social relations especially, to come up with a "we" but forms of resistance seem like one , often tenuous , way to form some unity.
My utopian vision is of social relations of honest disagreements coming from many differing subject positions (pluralism) and a real politics to deal with arguments. I see this as a possible mediation of hierarchy but requires much cultural transformation. ( for which I remain hopeful)
Reply to this