Twits in the Persian Gulf: The Real War Begins

Yes my friends!  It is true!  The American-engineered, virtual, digitally globalizing hegemony just keeps moving forward, unabated.  We want to make sure that, while most Iraqis still have no reliable phone service, electricity, sanitation or clean water, like it or not we will take them out of the “Saddam dark ages” and bring them into the bright light of a new American future to “help them be more themselves.” 

What kind of deranged thinking is this?  Well who else would have thought to send such a stellar delegation to Iraq for “home improvement” discussions than a 27-year-old ‘wunderkind’ from Stanford who is the youngest member of the State Department planning staff – a newbie who no doubt believes that the world can be made ‘whole’ again through the virulent, virtual community of twitter-heads and other new-media community-building-technologies?

Such a new-media, ‘second-coming’ mindset is even hailed by other presumed experts from the USA, who claim that this is an opportunity to create an open society, where Iraqis will become “different kinds of citizens,” blah, blah, blah…  Oh this is classic cultural imperialism.  We have discovered the Holy Grail, and now we will dispense its healing powers to the stupid, the deaf and the dumb of the world. Cultural imperialism knows no bounds when the self-assumption of manifest destiny infects every centimeter of one’s self image.

And with our own economy in tatters, our government thought it a worthwhile investment of tax dollars to send the wealthy executives of YouTube, Twitter, Google, Meetup.com, Howcast, AT&T, Blue State Digital and WordPress to Iraq in order to convince these people that they should be tweeting, googling, blogging, posting videos and ‘connecting with people’. 

Let us be honest with one another.  This is not at all about what the Iraqis need; it is about us Americans.  Why else would we make the investment?  I mean we are getting serious here.  Pull out the army and send in the marketers.  Goddamn, we are going to open up new markets for our products, and our values, if it kills them.  After all, ‘we are the champions of the world’, my friends; and so it is our god-given right to insure that the rest of the globe adheres to our program, accepts our values and lives our life style.  As one of our delegation, Twitter’s very own Jack Dorsey, articulated: “Our whole purpose here is to listen and try to understand the way they kind of are looking at the possibility of investing in Internet infrastructure.”  Well, despite all the attempted moderation (see italics), I guess we know what the real mission was!  Investment!!

We don’t care if there is a “cultural disconnect” with the Iraqis when we tell them ‘thou shalt twitter’ – because we seem to think that they have the wrong cultural baggage; and the sooner they adopt our cultural framework, the better for all involved.  And yes, we even admitted, “this is what could make a major change in the Middle East.”  That is what we really want, to make them all like us; and to create more markets for our products.  Even one of the delegation from Meetup.com, said, “Wow, so this is just America doing some sort of cultural imperialism on this country.”  To which the Meetup executive retorted, no “it is just to help them be more themselves.”  Again, where does such thinking find its meaningful foundation?  So, by changing the Middle East and making Iraqis into new kinds of citizens, we will be helping them to become more themselves.  Again, what kind of self-delusional lunacy is this?

God knows we have been sent several messages that we should stop meddling in the affairs of the Middle East; yet, we fail to have ears to hear.  Or else, hearing, we just refuse to believe, and so we plow ahead with the assurance of our own self-righteousness.  God bless America?

(Materials for this article were quoted from “Microblogging in Baghdad,” by Gillian Reagan, New York Observer, May 4, 2009)

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments

  • 5/16/2009 10:07 AM kulturcritic wrote:
    I need to comment briefly on my post here.

    In an AP report issued today, there was a description of a terrorist car bombing in northwestern Pakistan. The bombing also hit an internet cafe that had been targeted in the recent past. According to the AP report: "Safwat Ghayur, a senior police official, said one of a string of shops wrecked by the blast was an Internet cafe — a favorite target for violent Islamist extremists in Pakistan who consider the Web a source of moral corruption."

    It is revealing how the account of the Pakistani police official himself suggests that such cafe's are a favorite targwet of the extremeists, and that there is a 'moral' issue at the core of these terrorist bombings.

    In other words, no matter what is immoral about the killings themselves, the belief both of the terrorist and the police official is that there is a moral issue underlying these attacks that are culturally based.
    Reply to this
  • 5/17/2009 10:57 AM troutsky wrote:
    The colonialist mindset is deeply ingrained, with all its Orientalist pre-conceptions. What are schools teaching these days?

    I think there is a convergence of "moral" and "cultural"perceptions here, traditions, economics,the many critiques of "modernity" etc..In my novel I use Jerusalem as a symbol of this dangerous convergence, the great religions, cultural baggage , historical baggage,(Holocaust) and American interference, all focused on one ancient site, but certainly Islamabad or Kabul would represent such a "crossroads"as well.

    The problem I see with the "leave it alone" approach is that, similar to our debates about ecosystems, Man has already interfered to such a degree and so much harm already done that simply "doing nothing" does not guarantee a return to balance or harmony or even stability. I don't think we can now isolate ourselves from what we have helped create but something other than the WalMartization of the planet is needed.
    Reply to this
  • 5/19/2009 10:20 AM kultur wrote:
    Trot -

    I think it is important that you have identified Jerusalem as a key symbol of the convergence of old and new, pre and post civilized values. The problem is that we have already gone too far in the restructuring of reality that defines modern digiital society; but, the real question now is not 'can we stop' interefering, but rather, what is the justification for further interference other than our own desire of empire building, and creating a monopolar world run by cowboy capitalists, and greedy bastards.
    Reply to this
  • 5/19/2009 10:40 PM troutsky wrote:
    Today we see our "Change" President involved in the same absurd tango with Netanyahu (sp?), the Zionist stalling and dragging Iran into the framework, Obama using the same exhausted rhetoric about "negotiations". There is no negotiation, the terms have been known since Camp David.For the US to be an "honest broker" it would have to be willing to enforce demands.

    When Wilson reneged at Paris on his "fourteen points" it sent the exact same signal to the Arab world and when the CIA helped overthrow Mogadeh it sent the same message to the Persians.But I still believe an imperialist critique allows us to see the role global capitalism plays ( Persian oil, Israeli high tech, Turkish markets, etc) and presents a way forward through undermining that system.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.